Tell the Department of Justice no to facial recognition & other algorithmic tech!
The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security want to know what you think about law enforcement use of facial recognition technology and other biometric and predictive tech, specifically in terms of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.
We must make it clear: there is no way for law enforcement to use this technology safely. It is biased, infringes on our rights, and should be banned from use!
While we don’t assume these comments will stop these agencies from using facial recognition technology, we know it’s critical to engage in the process and make sure our opposition is clear.
Add your name to the comment now!
Background:
In response to the Biden Administration’s Executive Order on “Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety” the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are compiling a report that will include public input on law enforcement agency use of facial recognition and other biometric technologies, as well as use of predictive algorithms, data storage, and other similar technologies. The final report, which will include input from the Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, will identify ways to address concerns with privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties at the federal, state, and local levels.
But the reality is there are no rules or regulations that the DOJ or DHS could implement that would make their use of this technology safe.
The dragnet surveillance powered by artificial intelligence that this technology allows is categorically different from any surveillance we have seen before. It enables real-time tracking and behavior policing of an entire population at a previously impossible scale.
Facial recognition has already led to wrongful arrests of Black men and women. Immigration authorities have used these surveillance technologies to track, monitor, and police immigrants. This is done without consent, without an opportunity to opt out, and without concern for the harms it can cause, which range from deportation or cyberattacks that leave peoples’ most sensitive data exposed.
Facial recognition, and all surveillance, has a chilling effect on people’s ability to participate in protests. The right to show up to a protest, to make your voice heard without having your face scanned or details cataloged, should be a fundamental human right in any country that claims to be a democracy. The use of facial recognition, when used by law enforcement, is essentially the eradication of human privacy, fundamental liberty and ability to speak up safely. There is no reality where law enforcement can utilize these surveillance tools and we can retain basic levels of democracy, human rights, and freedom.
Additionally, when considering the implications of law enforcement use of biometric surveillance systems, we must consider data privacy. Biometric tools collect the most sensitive, immutable data a person has. Unlike a credit card or social security number, you cannot replace your face print, finger print, or other biometric data. So the threat of cyberattacks or other data breaches is all the more serious. And we’ve seen there is no reason to trust that law enforcement agencies can actually secure this data.
There is no amount of regulation, transparency, or oversight that will fix the dangers inherent in widespread face surveillance. Only a full ban can protect our privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.
Read the full comment
I am writing to express my opposition to law enforcement use of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies including fingerprint and iris biometric technologies; DNA biometric technologies (including familial searching), probabilistic genotyping software, and predictive phenotyping; and person-based predictive policing algorithms. These tools infringe on my right to privacy, they put my most sensitive personal information at risk, and they have a chilling effect on my right to free speech.
Biometric surveillance tools are disproportionately used to target and harm vulnerable communities, including Black and brown people, religious groups, and immigrants.
The United States justice system has a long history of racial bias that is augmented by the use of biometric surveillance systems. From using facial recognition surveillance on predominantly Black neighborhoods to searching mugshot databases that are disproportionately made up of Black and brown faces due to decades of racist policing practices, there is no question that the use of this technology is unjustly harmful for people of color. There are documented cases of Black people being misidentified by facial recognition because the systems are less accurate at identifying non-white faces, and this has led to wrongful arrests. But even with completely accurate facial recognition systems, their use within a racist justice system will continue to put Black and brown people at increased risk.
Immigrant communities already experience increased biometric surveillance by DHS, ICE, CBP, and other agencies that use these tools to track, target, and detain immigrants. This is done without consent, without an opportunity to opt out, and without concern for the harms it can cause, including deportation and cyberattacks that leave peoples’ most sensitive data exposed. Much like our broader criminal legal system, immigration enforcement systems have a deeply racist track record, and the use of biometric technologies to police immigrants supercharges that racism. There is no way to protect the rights of immigrants while placing them under these systems of constant surveillance.
Facial recognition has a chilling effect on people’s ability to exercise their protected rights, including to participate in protests. Law enforcement use of facial recognition allows for anyone who participates in protests or other constitutionally protected public actions to be identified and tracked. We have seen this threat realized in recent years when law enforcement agencies used facial recognition on Black Lives Matter protesters. The use of these tools essentially eradicates human privacy and the ability to speak up safely.
Person-based predictive policing algorithms similarly threaten our privacy and rights. Police departments have been known to deploy predictive policing technology in communities with little (if any) transparency or evaluation of the tools in use, and use these systems to determine who is likely to commit a crime. Again, the long history of racist policing in the U.S. has an influence on predictive technologies that rely on inputs of historic data. This has the effect of creating an endless cycle of racist policing practices influencing future policing practices that continue to over-police communities of color. While some claim that the predictive algorithms actually remove human bias from the process, the fact is that they rely on biased data.
These technologies allow law enforcement to track our movements and target people based on race, religion, political affiliation, and speech, which puts all of our rights in danger. There is nothing that the Department of Justice or Department of Homeland Security could change that would make me trust law enforcement agencies to use these technologies, and there is no way to meaningfully protect civil rights under their use. That is why I call on the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security to ban their use.
Send your comment directly to the DOJ
The DOJ and DHS would especially like to hear from people who have been personally impacted by the use of facial recognition, biometric and predictive algorithms. If you have a personal experience, please add it here and submit a comment.
This will open a new email in your browser’s default mail handler.
For your convenience, here are some links to compose your message in popular email services: